4.6 Review

Biofuel from plant biomass

Journal

AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 1-19

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-012-0114-9

Keywords

Biomass crops; Energy crops; High dry mass yield; Biofuels; Bioenergy potential; Perennials; LCA; Greenhouse gases; Land use change

Funding

  1. University of Canterbury, NZ
  2. FRST/MAF-Sustainable Land Management Mitigation & Adaptation to Climate Change, NZ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant biomass can be used for multiple forms of bioenergy, and there is a very large potential supply, depending on which global assessment is most accurate in terms of land area that could be available for biomass production. The most suitable plant species must be identified before the potential biomass production in a particular region can be quantified. This in turn depends on the degree of climatic adaptation by those species. In the range of climates present in New Zealand, biomass crop growth has less restriction due to water deficit or low winter temperature than in most world regions. Biomass production for energy use in New Zealand would be best utilised as transport fuel since 70 % of the country's electricity generation is already renewable, but nearly all of its transport fossil fuel is imported. There is a good economic development case for transport biofuel production using waste streams and biomass crops. This review identified the most suitable crop species and assessed their production potential for use within the climatic range present in New Zealand. Information from published work was used as a basis for selecting appropriate crops in a 2-year selection and evaluation process. Where there were knowledge gaps, the location-specific selections were further evaluated by field measurements. The data presented have superseded much of the speculative information on the suitability of species for the potential development of a biofuel industry in New Zealand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available