4.4 Article

Growth of pruned eucalypt clone in an agroforestry system in southeastern Brazil

Journal

AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 121-131

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-011-9432-1

Keywords

Green crown pruning; Multiproduct; Plant growth; Silvopastoral system

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento do Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV)
  5. Votorantim Siderurgia (VS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to identify pruning intensity and frequency that can be applied to eucalypt without imposing growth reduction, in an agroforestry system in Brazil (17 degrees 36' S and 46 degrees 42' W). Pruning treatments included removal of 0, 1/4 and 1/3 of the live crown height (LCH) with or without the removal of some thick branches above this height (TBA), in three or four lifts, which started at 9 months. There was no effect of pruning on tree height. Diameter (dbh) and volume per tree decreased (P <= 0.05) only with the removal of 1/3 of the LCH + TBA, of all trees of the stand, in three lifts, up to 36 months. The Weibull diameter distribution curves showed a higher proportion of trees in the greatest diameter classes with the removal of 1/4 or 1/3 of the LCH + TBA of selected trees, in four lifts, at the age of 36 months. The time required for applying pruning to a height of 6 m did not differ among treatments (P > 0.05). Pruning up to 1/3 of the LCH + TBA of selected trees, in 4 lifts (6-month intervals) is recommended because there was a higher proportion of trees in the greatest diameter classes and the dbh at the time of the last pruning was smaller than for the other treatments, which implies in reduced knotty core. The production of trees with larger diameter and reduced knotty core may increase farmers' income and reduce the pressure on native forests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available