4.7 Article

Organic matter and water management strategies to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in Vietnam

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages 137-146

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.010

Keywords

Methane; Nitrous oxide; Rice paddies; Water regimes; Straw compost; Straw biochar

Funding

  1. National Foundation for Science and Technology Development of Vietnam (NAFOSTED) [105.09-2011.21]
  2. SUSANE-II research project (Optimizing environmentally-friendly biogas production from livestock manure for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions) - Danish Foreign Ministry [09-076SDU]
  3. Climate Food and Farming (CLIFF)network under the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
  4. Vietnamese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reduction of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddies is of utmost importance in minimizing the impact of rice production on global warming. A field experiment was therefore conducted in farmers' field in Hanoi, Vietnam to examine whether the use of straw compost or straw biochar, in combination with the safe alternate wetting and drying (AWD) has the potential to suppress both CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddies while maintaining the rice yield. The study compared the proposed strategies with local farmers' practice of permanent flooding (PF) and farmyard manure (FYM) incorporation, respectively. A control treatment without organic matter incorporation in both AWD and PF water regimes was also included in the study; all treatments received equal amounts of mineral fertilizer. Gas emissions were monitored using the closed chamber method at seven-day intervals during the first 50 days and at 15-day intervals thereafter. Addition of FYM, straw compost and biochar increased CH4 emissions by 230%, 150% and 38%, respectively, when compared with the control treatments in both the AWD and PF water regimes. Within AWD, FYM increased N2O emissions by 30%, straw compost and biochar displayed similar amount of N2O emissions as the control treatment. Within PF, N2O emissions under FYM and straw compost were 40% and 35% higher than the control treatment, respectively, and biochar once again displayed similar amount of N2O emissions as the control treatment. Yield difference was not significant (p > 0.05) between any of the treatments. These results indicated that the straw compost incorporation might not reduce the global warming potential (GWP) and yield-scaled GWP of rice production, whereas biochar in combination with AWD has the potential to maintain the GWP and yield-scaled GWP of rice production at lower level than the farmers' practice. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available