4.7 Article

Flood detection from multi-temporal SAR data using harmonic analysis and change detection

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.12.001

Keywords

ENVISAT; Sentinel-1; Time series analysis; Otsu; Flood hazard; HAND index

Categories

Funding

  1. European Space Agency (ESA) through the Integrated Applications Program (IAP) Fully Automated Aqua Processing Service (FAAPS) (ESA) [4000105037/11/NL/US]
  2. Support To Science Element (STSE) Water Cycle Feasibility Study (WATCHFUL) (ESA) [4000107122/12/I-NB]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flood mapping from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Most available algorithms typically focus on single-image techniques which do not take into account the backscatter signature of a land surface under non-flooded conditions. In this study, harmonic analysis of a multi-temporal time series of >500 ENVISAT Advanced SAR (ASAR) scenes with a spatial resolution of 150 m was used to characterise the seasonality in backscatter under non-flooded conditions. Pixels which were inundated during a large-scale flood event during the summer 2007 floods of the River Severn (United Kingdom) showed strong deviations from normal seasonal behaviour as inferred from the harmonic model. The residuals were classified by means of an automatic threshold optimisation algorithm after masking out areas which are unlikely to be flooded using a topography-derived index. The results were validated against a reference dataset derived from high-resolution airborne imagery. For the water class, accuracies > 80% were found for non-urban land uses. A slight underestimation of the reference flood extent can be seen, mostly due to the lower spatial resolution of the ASAR imagery. Finally, an outlook for the proposed algorithm is given in the light of the Sentinel-1 mission. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available