4.7 Article

Urban sprawl and land abandonment affect the functional response traits of maize weed communities in a heterogeneous landscape

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 76-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.013

Keywords

Species richness; Farming practices; Field margin; Generalised additive model; Mediterranean; Semi-natural vegetation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landscape effects on arable weed communities have mainly been studied in areas dominated by intensive agricultural land use, while less attention has been paid to the same effects in cultivated fields close to the rural-urban interface. Our objective was to assess the effects of ongoing agricultural land abandonment and urban sprawl on arable weed communities since this is a widespread phenomena in Mediterranean landscapes. Weeds were sampled at three different distances (5, 10, 15m) from the field margin in 21 maize fields located within a 75 km(2) area in Liguria and Tuscany, Italy. Species were aggregated in functional response groups based on chorological categories, Raunkir life forms and CSR plant strategies. Landscape surrounding each field was assessed in four circular buffers of radii ranging from 250 to 1500 m. Attributes characterising fields and field margins were also considered. Community composition and diversity of weed communities were affected by field and landscape characteristics. Old and new abandonment increased species richness and weed diversity but had an opposite effect on the Raunkir functional response groups. Urban sprawl was positively correlated with abundance of geophytes, competitive and cosmopolite species and negatively correlated with therophytes and competitive-ruderals. Most landscape parameters had stronger effect at the smallest scale. The effect of landscape parameters was clearer when weeds were classified by functional response trait than by taxonomy. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available