4.3 Article

Why Do Orangutans Leave the Trees? Terrestrial Behavior Among Wild Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) at Tuanan, Central Kalimantan

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 11, Pages 1216-1229

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22460

Keywords

Borneo; orangutan terrestriality; Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii; ground travel; direct observation; camera trapping

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Zurich
  2. Singapore-Delft Water Alliance
  3. A. H. Schultz Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orangutans (genus Pongo) are the largest arboreal mammals, but Bornean orangutans (P. pygmaeus spp.) also spend time on the ground. Here, we investigate ground use among orangutans using 32,000 hr of direct focal animal observations from a well-habituated wild population of Bornean orangutans (P. p. wurmbii) living in a closed-canopy swamp forest at Tuanan, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ground use did not change with increasing observation time of well-habituated individuals, suggesting it was not an artifact of observer presence. Flanged males spent the most time on the ground (ca. 5% of active time), weaned immatures the least (around 1%). Females and immatures descended mainly to feed, especially on termites, whereas flanged males traveled more while on the ground. Flanged males may travel more inconspicuously, and perhaps also faster, when moving on the ground. In addition, orangutans engaged in ground-specific behavior, including drinking from and bathing in swamp pools. Supplementary records from 20 ground-level camera traps, totaling 3986 trap days, confirmed the observed age-sex biases in ground use at Tuanan. We conclude that ground use is a natural part of the Bornean orangutan behavioral repertoire, however it remains unclear to what extent food scarcity and canopy structure explain population differences in ground use. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available