4.7 Article

Grazing exclusion affects soil and plant communities, but has no impact on soil carbon storage in an upland grassland

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 118-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.012

Keywords

Moorland; Grass-dominated ecosystems; Carbon; Nitrogen; Soil properties; Calluna vulgaris; Ecosystem services; Uplands; Grazing management; Yorkshire Dales

Funding

  1. Mexican Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the impact of 7 years of grazing exclusion on vegetation and belowground properties related to soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling in grazed, upland grassland in northern England. For this, we compared a landscape-level, moorland restoration project (grazing exclusion) with adjacent continuously grazed acidic grasslands to test whether changes in vegetation composition after restoration impacted on soil properties including soil C storage. Grazing exclusion significantly increased the proportion of dwarf-shrubs at the expense of graminoids. Despite high seasonal variability, this change in vegetation was associated with increased plant litter mass, soil moisture content and the ratio of dissolved organic to inorganic N, and reductions in rates of ammonium mineralisation, soil microbial activity, and microbial biomass N. Our observations suggest that grazing-exclusion as a restoration tool for upland habitats results in a slowing down of rates of C and N cycling. However, as yet, this has had no detectable impact on total C and N stocks in surface soil. Whereas increases in soil C and N stocks might be expected in the longer term, our results suggest that a certain level of grazing is compatible with the provision of ecosystem services such as soil C storage under traditional upland farming practices. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available