4.7 Article

The effects of land sparing and wildlife-friendly practices on grassland bird abundance within organic farmlands

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 10-16

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.021

Keywords

Agriculture; Avian; Bayesian; Great Plains; Heterogeneity; North America

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Integrated Organic Program [2005-51300-02374]
  2. USDA McIntire-Stennis program
  3. University of Nebraska Lincoln Center for Great Plains Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodiversity is often greater in organic farm systems than non-organic. However, variation in land use within organic systems limits absolute statements about its value for species conservation. Thus, a need is evident to better understand what practices associated with organic farming benefit conservation. We modeled abundance, within organic systems, of six grassland birds of conservation concern as an outcome of applied wildlife-friendly and land sparing practices at multiple spatial scales. We used a Poisson-binomial model to estimate the relative effect of abundance drivers while accounting for detectability. At the field scale, species response to vegetation structure was mixed. At a local scale, Dickcissels were more abundant at points with greater percentage of alfalfa and soybean. Three species were less abundant at points with a greater percent of local woodland and there was no significant response to local linear grass. Grasshopper Sparrows were more abundant at points with more local block grassland. At a landscape scale, Western Meadowlarks and Ring-necked Pheasants were more abundant at points with a greater percent of grassland in the landscape. Results highlight the importance of a multiscale approach and demonstrate that effective management of species should consider costs and benefits of wildlife-friendly and land sparing practices. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available