4.7 Article

Conversion of the coastal Atlantic forest to pasture: Consequences for the nitrogen cycle and soil greenhouse gas emissions

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 37-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.010

Keywords

Atlantic forest; Nitrogen cycle; Carbon cycle; Greenhouse gases; Land use change

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2006/57068-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated how land use change affected the nitrogen cycle and greenhouse gas fluxes. We measured soil temperature and water-filled pore space (WFPS), as well as nitrate and ammonium concentrations, mineralization and nitrification rates, and flux of CH4, CO2 and N2O in soils of pasture catchment and in soils of a forest catchment located on the north coast of the State of Sao Paulo. The main vegetation type in the forest catchment is primary Atlantic Montane Forest, while the pasture is an unfertilized 40-year old area planted with Brachiaria humidicola. Four plots were used for monthly sampling in each land use for an entire year. Soil temperature was always higher in pasture than in forest soils, while WFPS was lower in the pasture in relation to forest soils. Pasture soils were a weak source of CH4 during the winter months and a less strong sink of methane than the forest soils during the rainy summer months of the year. The annual median CH4 uptake was -1.8 +/- 1.0 mg m(-2) d(-1) in the forest in contrast to -0.6 +/- 0.9 mg m(-2) d(-1) in pasture soils. CO2 emissions were similar in the winter, but higher in the summer months in pasture soils in relation to forest soils. The annual median flux in the forest was 4.2 +/- 1.5 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) and increased in the pasture to 6.5 +/- 2.9 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). In contrast. N2O fluxes were smaller in the pasture (0.3 +/- 0.7 ng cm(-2) h(-1)) than in forest soils (0.5 +/- 0.5 ng cm(-2) h(-1)). (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available