4.7 Article

Controls over soil microbial biomass responses to carbon amendments in agricultural systems: A meta-analysis

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages 241-252

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.020

Keywords

Microbial biomass; Compost; Manure; Agriculture; Soils; Carbon; Nitrogen; Fertilization

Funding

  1. Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center
  2. University of New Hampshire Agriculture Experimental Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil microbial biomass (MB) facilitates key ecosystem functions such as soil aggregation and nutrient cycling and makes a substantial contribution to soil organic matter. While agricultural conversion drastically reduces MB, the use of organic amendments is an effective way to rebuild depleted MB. Yet, little is known about broad-scale, global controls over MB responses to organic inputs. We used a meta-analysis to identify the degree to which soil properties, agricultural management, and geographic location regulate MB response (carbon, C-mic; nitrogen, N-mic; and C:N ratio, C:N-mic) to animal manure-based inputs relative to inorganic fertilizers. We show that organic amendments increased C-mic by 36% and N-mic by 27% across all observations. The chemistry of amendments and their application rates were the strongest regulators of C-mic but edaphic properties were also important. C:N-mic averaged 8.6 and was not influenced by organic amendments under any conditions, providing evidence that the physiological requirements of microbes, rather than management or environmental factors, constrain their elemental stoichiometry. Our study indicates that even small quantities of organic amendments can be used to rapidly restore MB across a range of cropping systems but specific responses depend upon the type and rate of inputs as well soil characteristics. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available