4.7 Review

Management options to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from intensively grazed pastures: A review

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 136, Issue 3-4, Pages 282-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.003

Keywords

Nitrous oxide; Grazed pasture; Greenhouse gas; Mitigation; LCA

Funding

  1. New Zealand Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium (PGGRC)
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF)
  3. New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from grazed pastures represent a significant source of atmospheric N2O. With an improved understanding and quantification of N sources, transformation processes, and soil and climatic conditions controlling N2O emissions, a number of management options can be identified to reduce N2O emissions from grazed pasture systems. The mitigation options discussed in this paper are: optimum soil management, limiting the amount of N fertiliser or effluent applied when soil is wet; lowering the amount of N excreted in animal urine by using low-N feed supplements as an alternative to fertiliser N-boosted grass; plant and animal selection for increased N use efficiency, using N process inhibitors that inhibit the conversion of urea to ammonium and ammonium to nitrate in soil; use of stand-off/feed pads or housing systems during high risk periods of N loss. The use of single or multiple mitigation options always needs to be evaluated in a whole farm system context and account for total greenhouse gas emissions including methane and carbon dioxide. They should focus on ensuring overall efficiency gains through decreasing N losses per unit of animal production and achieving a tighter N cycle. Whole-system life-cycle-based environmental analysis should also be conducted to assess overall environmental emissions associated the N2O mitigation options. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available