4.4 Article

Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making

Journal

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 179-194

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z

Keywords

Agricultural research; Participatory approaches; Framework; Typologies; Scientists; Stakeholders

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. National Research Council of Thailand
  3. Vietnamese Ministry of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent discourse in the field of participatory agricultural research has focused on how to blend various forms and intensities of stakeholder participation with quality agricultural science, moving beyond the simple farmer-first ideology of the 1980s and early 1990s. Yet, most existing frameworks of participation in agricultural research still adhere to a linear typology of participatory research with an inherent claim of the more participation, the better. In this article, we propose a new framework that looks at participatory research elements along different dimensions and attributes and thus takes into account the diversity and dynamics of agricultural research projects. The framework provides a basis for agricultural researchers engaged in participatory processes with local stakeholders to decide for which issues and in which phases certain participatory elements could be used in a specific research context. Rather than aiming at maximizing the adoption of participatory methods, it can thus become a tool for optimizing the use of participatory approaches in agricultural research. We conclude that this framework can be a starting point for a more thoughtful integration of participatory elements in agricultural research projects that does justice to the multidimensional and dynamic nature of stakeholder participation in varying contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available