4.7 Article

Is it possible to increase the sustainability of arable and ruminant agriculture by reducing inputs?

Journal

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 99, Issue 2-3, Pages 117-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.11.001

Keywords

Sustainable agriculture; Total factor productivity; Environment; Environmental burden; Resource use; Environmental economics; Arable; Ruminant; Life-cycle assessment; Ecosystem services

Funding

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. GB Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  3. Dutch Ministry of AgriculNature and Food Quality [BO-5-398-1331.010.3600]
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00004982, BBS/E/C/00004930] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004982, BBS/E/C/00004930] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Until recently, agricultural production was optimised almost exclusively for profit but now farming is under pressure to meet environmental targets, A method is presented and applied for optimising the sustainability of agricultural production system in terms of both economics and the environment. Components of the agricultural production chain are analysed using environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) and a financial value attributed to the resources consumed and burden imposed on the environment by agriculture, as well as to the products. The sum of the Outputs is weighed against the inputs and the system considered sustainable if the value of the outputs exceeds those of the inputs. If this ratio is plotted against the sum of inputs for all levels of input, a diminishing returns curve should result and the optimum level of sustainability is located at the maximum of the curve. Data were taken from standard economic almanacs and from published LCA reports on the extent of consumption and environmental burdens resulting from firming in the UK. Land-use is Valued using the concept of ecosystem services. Our analysis suggests that agricultural systems ire sustainable at rates of production close to current levels practiced in the UK. Extensification of farming, which is thought to favour non-food ecosystem services, requires more land to produce the same amount of food. The loss of ecosystem services hitherto provided by natural land brought into production is greater than that which can be provided by land now under extensive farming. This loss of ecosystem service is large in comparison to the benefit of a reduction in emission of nutrients and pesticides. However, food production is essential, so the coupling of subsidies that represent a relatively large component of the economic output in EU farming, with measures to reduce pollution are well-aimed. Measures to ensure that as little extra land is brought into production as possible or that marginal land is allowed to revert to nature would seem to be equally well-aimed, even if this required more intensive use of productive areas. We conclude that current arable farming in the EU is sustainable with either realistic prices for products or some degree of subsidy and that productivity per unit area of land and greenhouse gas emission (subsuming primary energy consumption) are the most important pressures on the sustainability of farming. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available