4.3 Article

Incorporating Ecology and Social System Into Formal Hypotheses to Guide Field Studies of Color Vision in Primates

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages 516-526

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22371

Keywords

primates; color vision; polymorphism; foraging; dispersal; Callicebus

Categories

Funding

  1. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  2. Leakey Foundation
  3. Sigma Xi Society
  4. Organization for Tropical Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The X-linked gene polymorphism responsible for the variable color vision of most Neotropical monkeys and some lemurs is thought to be maintained by balancing selection, such that trichromats have an advantage over dichromats for some ecologically important task(s). However, evidence for such an advantage in wild primate populations is equivocal. The purpose of this study is to refine a hypothesis for a trichromat advantage by tailoring it to the ecology of territorial primates with female natal dispersal, such that dispersing trichromatic females have a foraging and, by extension, survival advantage over dichromats. I then examine the most practical way to test this hypothesis using field data. Indirect evidence in support of the hypothesis may take the form of differences in genotype frequencies among life stages and differences in disperser food item encounter rates. A deterministic evolutionary matrix population model and a stochastic model of food patch encounter rates are constructed to investigate the magnitude of such differences and the likelihood of statistical detection using field data. Results suggest that, although the sampling effort required to detect the hypothesized genotype frequency differences is impractical, a field study of reasonable scope may be able to detect differences in disperser foraging rates. This study demonstrates the utility of incorporating socioecological details into formal hypotheses during the planning stages of field studies of primate color vision. Am. J. Primatol. 77:516-526, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available