4.7 Article

How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 204-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.009

Keywords

Photosynthetic limitation; Stomatal conductance; V-cmax; Mesophyll conductance; Drought; Model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Models disagree on how to represent effects of drought stress on plant gas exchange. Some models assume drought stress affects the marginal water use efficiency of plants (marginal WUE=partial derivative A/partial derivative E; i.e. the change in photosynthesis per unit of change in transpiration) whereas others assume drought stress acts directly on photosynthetic capacity. We investigated drought stress in an analysis of results from 22 experimental data sets where photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and predawn leaf water potential were measured at increasing levels of water stress. Our analysis was framed by a recently developed stomatal model that reconciles the empirical and optimal approaches to predicting stomatal conductance. The model has single parameter g(1), a decreasing function of marginal WUE. Species differed greatly in their estimated g(1) values under moist conditions, and in the rate at which g(1) declined with water stress. In some species, particularly the sclerophyll trees, g(1) remained nearly constant or even increased. Photosynthesis was found almost universally to decrease more than could be explained by the reduction in g(1), implying a decline in apparent carboxylation capacity (V-cmax). Species differed in the predawn water potential at which apparent V-cmax declined most steeply, and in the steepness of this decline. Principal components analysis revealed a gradient in water relation strategies from trees to herbs. Herbs had higher apparent V-cmax under moist conditions but trees tended to maintain more open stomata and higher apparent V-cmax under dry conditions. There was also a gradient from malacophylls to sclerophylls, with sclerophylls having lower g(1) values under well-watered conditions and a lower sensitivity of apparent V-cmax to drought. Despite the limited amount of data available for this analysis, it is possible to draw some firm conclusions for modeling: (1) stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis must both be considered for the short-term response to drought and (2) plants adapted to arid climate respond very differently from others. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available