4.7 Article

Optimal geometric configuration and algorithms for LAI indirect estimates under row canopies: The case of vineyards

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 8, Pages 1307-1316

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.03.001

Keywords

Vineyard; LAI estimation; Architecture modeling; Hemispherical photographs; LAI2000; Ceptometer

Funding

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
  2. Agropolis Fondation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf Area Index (LAI) retrieval performances from gap fraction measurements are investigated over vertically trained vineyards. A 3D vineyard model was constructed to analyze the influence of canopy architecture characteristics and light direction on LAI estimation. Results show that for specific directions - close to zenith and parallel to the rows - gap fraction (P-o) is mainly driven by vineyard architectural characteristics with small effect of LAI due to the clumped foliage distribution. The sensitivity of P-o to LAI is enhanced for directions far from zenith and perpendicular to the rows, resulting in lower uncertainties in LAI retrieval. The 3D vineyard model was used to simulate a range of cases and those findings were supported with two calibrated neural networks to retrieve LAI from P-o measured in several directional configurations. These relationships were tested over independent field experiments conducted on commercial vineyards using either hemispherical photographs or ceptometer. Both experiments highlighted the importance of selecting an appropriate geometrical configuration and introducing information on canopy architecture (canopy height and vegetation width on the row relative to inter-row spacing) to reduce LAI uncertainties associated with vineyard spatial arrangement. For the optimal configurations, estimates of LAI with hemispherical photographs (RMSE = 0.389) and ceptometer (RMSE = 0.27) were obtained and compared to destructive LAI measurements. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available