4.0 Article

Logistic modelling of smallholder livestock farmers' adoption of tree-based fodder technology in Zimbabwe

Journal

AGREKON
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 379-392

Publisher

AGRICULTURAL ECON ASSOC SOUTH AFRICA
DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2008.9523806

Keywords

Agroforestry; animal nutrition; dairy production; economic modelling; sustainable agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on field data collected from 131 small scale dairy farmers that were randomly selected from four agro-ecological zones, this study assessed the potential of adoption of fodder batik technology as a means for improving livestock production and income generation for smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. Using a logit modelling approach, it also identified the drivers of adoption of the technology by analysing the influence of household characteristics and ecological factors on farmers' decision to adopt the technology. The model correctly predicted 75% of observed adoption and non-adoption by farmers. Results reveal that dairy herd size, land holding size, membership of dairy association and agro-ecological potential are the key factors influencing farmers' adoption of fodder batik. Age, sex, household size and educational level of farmers play lesser role. Male and female farmers were equally likely to take up and practice fodder batik if they are given equal access to information and incentives. The study recommends farmer-led extension approaches where farmers who possess certain key characteristics should constitute the initial group for disseminating information regarding the technology in rural communities. The results highlight the importance of access to dairy product markets as a driver for the adoption of fodder banks. It is recommended that forging a strategic partnership with the Dairy Development Programme (DDP) will offer high potential for enhancing the scaling up of the adoption and impact of fodder bank technology in the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available