4.6 Article

Overexpression of Sir2 in the adult fat body is sufficient to extend lifespan of male and female Drosophila

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 315-327

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100553

Keywords

Sir2; lifespan; fat body; dietary restriction; fat metabolism; lipid droplet; gene expression

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research in the framework of Ernahrungsforschung - fur ein gesundes Leben, Modul: Biomedizinische Ernahrungsforschung-Vision Epifood
  2. Excellence Cluster of the German Research Foundation (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sir2 is the most intensively discussed longevity gene in current aging research. Although, the gene encoding for a NAD(+)-dependent histone deacetylase initially was found to extend lifespan of various organisms ranging from yeast to mammals, serious doubts regarding its role in longevity have been expressed recently. In this study, we tested whether tissue-specific overexpression of Sir2 in the adult fat body can extend lifespan when compared to genetically identical controls. We also wanted to elucidate the mechanisms by which fat body Sir2 promotes longevity by studying the phenotypic and transcriptional changes in the fat body. We found that moderate (3-fold) Sir2 overexpression in the fat body during adulthood only can promote longevity in both sexes by roughly 13 %. In addition, we obtained transcriptional profiles elicited by this overexpression and propose a role for Sir2 in lipid droplet biology especially under conditions of starvation. Furthermore, our data do not support the idea of Sir2 mediating the response to dietary restriction (DR) because transcriptional profiles of fat bodies after DR or Sir2 overexpression do not match. This study provides additional independent evidence for the concept of Sir2 as a longevity gene and as a promising pharmacological target to cure age-related diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available