4.4 Article

Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality

Journal

ACCOUNTING REVIEW
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 1521-1552

Publisher

AMER ACCOUNTING ASSOC
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521

Keywords

audit quality; Big 4 accounting firms; earnings quality; accruals; earnings benchmarks; going-concern audit reports

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Larger offices of Big 4 auditors are predicted to have higher quality audits for SEC registrants due to greater in-house experience in administering such audits. We test this prediction by examining a sample of 6,568 U. S. firm-year observations for the period 2003-2005 and audited by 285 unique Big 4 offices. Results are consistent with larger offices providing higher quality audits. Specifically, larger offices are more likely to issue going-concern audit reports, and clients in larger offices evidence less aggressive earnings management behavior. These findings are robust to extensive controls for client risk factors and to controls for other auditor characteristics. While the evidence suggests audit quality is higher on average in larger Big 4 offices, we make no claims that audit quality is unacceptably low in smaller offices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available