4.7 Article

A metabolic signature predicts biological age in mice

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 93-101

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12025

Keywords

aging; life-span studies; mouse; mTERT; Telomerase; Telomere

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2008-05384, CSD2007-00017]
  2. European Union [2007-A-201630, 2007-A-200950]
  3. European Research Council [232854]
  4. Korber Foundation
  5. Fundacion Botin
  6. Fundacion Lilly
  7. MICINN (CIBERehd)
  8. European Union (HEPADIP)
  9. NIH [AT-1576, AT-4896]
  10. ETORTEK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our understanding of the mechanisms by which aging is produced is still very limited. Here, we have determined the sera metabolite profile of 117 wild-type mice of different genetic backgrounds ranging from 8 to 129 weeks of age. This has allowed us to define a robust metabolomic signature and a derived metabolomic score that reliably/accurately predicts the age of wild-type mice. In the case of telomerase-deficient mice, which have a shortened lifespan, their metabolomic score predicts older ages than expected. Conversely, in the case of mice that overexpress telomerase, their metabolic score corresponded to younger ages than expected. Importantly, telomerase reactivation late in life by using a TERT-based gene therapy recently described by us significantly reverted the metabolic profile of old mice to that of younger mice, further confirming an anti-aging role for telomerase. Thus, the metabolomic signature associated with natural mouse aging accurately predicts aging produced by telomere shortening, suggesting that natural mouse aging is in part produced by presence of short telomeres. These results indicate that the metabolomic signature is associated with the biological age rather than with the chronological age. This constitutes one of the first aging-associated metabolomic signatures in a mammalian organism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available