4.7 Article

Vaccination-induced changes in human B-cell repertoire and pneumococcal IgM and IgA antibody at different ages

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 922-930

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00732.x

Keywords

ageing; B-cell repertoire; immunoglobulin A; immunoglobulin M; vaccination

Funding

  1. Research into Ageing [323]
  2. Human Frontiers Science Program [RGP9/2007]
  3. BBSRC
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [03WKR02A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that older people are more susceptible to morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, particularly from pulmonary diseases such as pneumococcal pneumonia where vaccines do not provide efficient protection as in younger populations. We have previously shown that the B-cell repertoire in the old is reduced and hypothesise that this may contribute to the impaired humoral responses of the elderly. Here, we investigated the repertoire and antibody responses to winter vaccination in two age groups, aged 1849 and 6589. We found that the serum IgM and IgA pneumococcal responses were significantly impaired in the older group, with no difference in IgG levels. IGHM spectratype analysis seems to be the most promising in terms of its predictive ability for vaccine responses. Spectratypes showed a clear change in the repertoire at day 7 after vaccination, with a return to the baseline levels at day 28. The changes at day 7 reflected expansion of IGH sequences that have smaller, more hydrophilic, CDR3 regions, and these changes were attenuated in the older group. The older group was more likely to have spectratypes indicative of a reduced diversity at day 0 and day 28. On average, the baseline repertoire in the older group was comprised of larger CDR3 regions than in the younger group. In conclusion, IgA and IgM responses are significantly impaired in the elderly pneumococcal response and are likely key mediators of protection. Hydrophilicity and/or small size of the IGH CDR3 appear to be important in these responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available