4.7 Article

Aging-related changes in astrocytes in the rat retina: imbalance between cell proliferation and cell death reduces astrocyte availability

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 526-540

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00402.x

Keywords

aging; apoptosis; cell counts; central nervous system; glial fibrillary acidic protein; S100

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in astrocyte density, morphology, proliferation and apoptosis occurring in the central nervous system during physiological aging. Astrocytes in retinal whole-mount preparations from Wistar rats aged 3 (young adult) to 25 months (aged) were investigated qualitatively and quantitatively following immunofluorohistochemistry. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100 and Pax2 were used to identify astrocytes, and blood vessels were localized using Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4. Cell proliferation was assessed by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and cell death by TUNEL-labelling and immunolocalization of the apoptosis markers active caspase 3 and endonuclease G. The density and total number of parenchymal astrocytes in the retina increased between 3 and 9 months of age but decreased markedly between 9 and 12 months. Proliferation of astrocytes was detected at 3 months but virtually ceased beyond that age, whereas the proportion of astrocytes that were TUNEL positive and relative expression of active caspase 3 and endonuclease G increased progressively with aging. In addition, in aged retinas astrocytes exhibited gliosis-like morphology and loss of Pax2 reactivity. A small population of Pax2(+)/GFAP(-) cells was detected in both young adult and aged retinas. The reduction in the availability of astrocytes in aged retinas and other aging-related changes reported here may have a significant impact on the ability of astrocytes to maintain homeostasis and support neuronal function in old age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available