4.4 Article

School Outcomes of Aggressive-Disruptive Children: Prediction From Kindergarten Risk Factors and Impact of the Fast Track Prevention Program

Journal

AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 114-130

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ab.21467

Keywords

aggressive-disruptive children; school outcomes; school readiness; preventive intervention

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [R18MH48403, R18MH50951, R18MH50952, R18MH50953, K05MH00797, K05DA15226]
  2. National Institute of Drug Abuse and the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (NIDA) [DA16903, DA017589, DA015226]
  3. Department of Education [S184U30002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multi-gate screening process identified 891 children with aggressive-disruptive behavior problems at school entry. Fast Track provided a multi-component preventive intervention in the context of a randomized-controlled design. In addition to psychosocial support and skill training for parents and children, the intervention included intensive reading tutoring in first grade, behavioral management consultation with teachers, and the provision of homework support (as needed) through tenth grade. This study examined the impact of the intervention, as well as the impact of the child's initial aggressive-disruptive behaviors and associated school readiness skills (cognitive ability, reading readiness, attention problems) on academic progress and educational placements during elementary school (Grades 14) and during the secondary school years (Grades 710), as well as high school graduation. Child behavior problems and skills at school entry predicted school difficulties (low grades, grade retention, placement in a self-contained classroom, behavior disorder classification, and failure to graduate). Disappointingly, intervention did not significantly improve these long-term school outcomes. Aggr. Behav. 39:114130, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available