4.4 Article

Adolescent aggression and social cognition in the context of personality: Impulsivity as a moderator of predictions from social information processing

Journal

AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 511-520

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ab.20263

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD030572] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA016903, P20 DA017589, K05 DA015226] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH57024, R01 MH057024, R01 MH042498, R01 MH057095, MH56961, MH57095, R01 MH056961] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study asked how individual differences in social cognition and personality interact in predicting later aggressive behavior. It was hypothesized that the relationship between immediate response evaluations in social information processing (SIP) and later aggressive behavior would be moderated by impulsivity. In particular, the immediate positive evaluations of aggressive responses would be more strongly related to later aggressive behavior for high-impulsive than for low-impulsive individuals, because high-impulsive children would be less likely to integrate peripheral information and consider long-term future consequences of their actions. Participants were 585 adolescents (52%. male) and their mothers and teachers from the longitudinal Child Development Project. Structural equation modeling indicate(] that teacher-reported impulsivity at ages 11-13 moderated the association between adolescents' endorsement of aggressive responses in hypothetical, ambiguous situations and subsequent mother-reported aggressive behavior. Specifically, positive endorsement of aggressive responses at age 13 was significantly related to later aggressive behavior (age 14-17) for participants with high and medium levels of impulsivity, but this association was not significant for participants with low levels of impulsivity. This study provides evidence of personality variables as potential moderators of the link between SI P and behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available