4.7 Article

Prevalence and correlates of frailty among community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 197-203

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp204

Keywords

frailty; prevalence; older people; social inequalities; co-morbidity; elderly

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. University of Southampton
  3. ESRC [ES/G027153/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0400491, MC_UP_A620_1015] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A620_1014, U1475000001, G0400491, MC_UP_A620_1015, U1475000002, MC_U147585824] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods: frailty, defined by Fried, was examined among community-dwelling young-old (64-74 years) men (n = 320) and women (n = 318) who participated in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, UK. Results: the prevalence of frailty was 8.5% among women and 4.1% among men (P = 0.02). Among men, older age (P = 0.009), younger age of leaving education (P = 0.05), not owning/mortgaging one's home (odds ratio [OR] for frailty 3.45 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.01-11.81], P = 0.05, in comparison with owner/mortgage occupiers) and reduced car availability (OR for frailty 3.57 per unit decrease in number of cars available [95% CI 1.32, 10.0], P = 0.01) were associated with increased odds of frailty. Among women, not owning/mortgaging one's home (P = 0.02) was associated with frailty. With the exception of car availability among men (P = 0.03), all associations were non-significant (P > 0.05) after adjustment for co-morbidity. Conclusions: frailty is not uncommon even among community-dwelling young-old men and women in the UK. There are social inequalities in frailty which appear to be mediated by co-morbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available