4.0 Article

Association of sleep quality and dementia among long-lived Chinese older adults

Journal

AGE
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1423-1432

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-012-9432-8

Keywords

Dementia; Sleep quality; Sleep duration; Nonagenarians; Centenarians

Funding

  1. Discipline Construction Foundation of Sichuan University
  2. Project of Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province [2006Z09-006-4]
  3. Construction Fund for Subjects of West China Hospital of Sichuan University [XK05001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we examined the existence of relationship between sleep quality and dementia in subjects aged 90 years and above. The sample included 216 men and 444 women. Dementia and sleep quality were measured with 30-item mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, respectively. Subjects with dementia had higher sleep quality score (7.83 +/- 2.15 vs. 5.22 +/- 2.49; P < 0.0001), longer sleep latency (50.97 +/- 21.33 vs. 37.61 +/- 12.53; P < 0.0001), and a lower sleep efficiency percentage (73.95 +/- 8.783 vs. 81.32 +/- 10.21; P < 0.0001) and more likely to report poor sleep quality (25.42 vs.17.13 %; P = 0.035). Subjects with poor sleep quality had significantly lower MMSE scores (P = 0.007) and higher prevalence of dementia (P = 0.042). Multiple logistic regressions were performed by adjusting clinical factors that are thought to be associated with dementia or sleep quality. We found that poor sleep quality was a risk factor for dementia (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.719, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.138-2.597; adjusted OR 1.759, 95 % CI 1.012-3.057). There was no significant difference in MMSE scores (11.25 +/- 3.40, 16.26 +/- 5.14, and 15.43 +/- 5.51; P = 0.105) among participants with daily average sleep durations of < 5, 5-9, and > 9 h, respectively. Among Chinese nonagenarians and centenarians, dementia was correlated with poor sleep quality, longer sleep latency, and lower sleep efficiency percentage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available