4.5 Article

ESTROGEN EXPOSURE, OBESITY AND THYROID DISEASE IN WOMEN WITH SEVERE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 433-442

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/2047-783X-14-10-433

Keywords

Severe pulmonary hypertension; Estrogen; Menopause; Thyroid Disease; Autoimmunity; Obesity

Funding

  1. Thomas F. Jeffress and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust
  2. VCU Health System BIRCWH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe pulmonary hypertension is a lethal group of disorders which preferentially afflicts women. It appears that in recent years the patient profile has shifted towards older, obese, and postmenopausal women, suggesting that endocrine factors may be important. Several studies have revealed an increased prevalence of thyroid disease in these patients, but no studies have evaluated for a coexistence of endocrine factors. In particular, no studies have attempted to evaluate for concurrent thyroid disease, obesity and long-term estrogen exposure in patients. 88 patients attending the Pulmonary Hypertension Association 8th International meeting completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. Information was collected regarding reproductive history, height, weight, and previous diagnosis of thyroid disease. 46% met criteria for obesity. 41% reported a diagnosis of thyroid disease. 81% of women reported prior use of hormone therapy 70% reported greater than 10 years of exogenous hormone use. 74% of female patients reported two or more of potentially disease modifying endocrine factors (obesity, thyroid disease or estrogen therapy). The coexistent high prevalence in our cohort of exogenous estrogen exposure, thyroid disease and obesity suggests that an interaction of multiple endocrine factors might contribute to the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension and may represent epigenetic modifiers in genetically-susceptible individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available