4.1 Article

Evidence of deep genetic divergence between populations of an important recreational fishery species, Lichia amia L. 1758, around southern Africa

Journal

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 585-591

Publisher

NATL INQUIRY SERVICES CENTRE PTY LTD
DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2012.749809

Keywords

fisheries management; genetic diversity; leervis; mtDNA; population structure

Funding

  1. Fundacao da Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36176/2007]
  2. National Research Foundation [66957]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36176/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lichia amia is an important coastal recreational fishery species with a cosmopolitan distribution in the eastern Atlantic. In southern Africa, it is distributed from southern Angola to northern KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa. A recent biological survey revealed differences between Angolan and South African individuals suggesting that they may represent separate stocks. As fishery management decisions should be based on accurate knowledge of population structure, an initial survey of the genetic substructuring of L. amia was conducted on samples collected in southern Angola and South Africa. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure was conducted using a fragment of the mitochondrial Control Region. Obtained genetic diversity levels were within the expected range for marine teleosts (h = 0.867, pi = 0.007), and two deeply divergent (southern Angolan and South African) populations were identified (average phi(ST) = 0.78) across the Benguela Current system. These results suggest that Angolan and South African L. amia should be managed as two independent stocks. This work represents the first assessment of population genetic substructuring across the Benguela Current of a valuable coastal fishery resource, and has application for future fisheries management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available