4.3 Article

Change in autism classification with early intervention: Predictors and outcomes

Journal

RESEARCH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 967-976

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.05.001

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorders; Autism; ADOS algorithm; Diagnostic classification; Diagnostic stability; Cognitive ability; Verbal ability; Adaptive skills

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study characterized stability and changes of autism diagnostic classification with intervention in very young children and examined pre-treatment predictors and post-intervention outcome. Sixty-eight children diagnosed with autism, aged 1835 months (M = 25.4. SD = 4.0) participated in the study. Children underwent comprehensive evaluations at pre-intervention time (T1) and after I year of intervention (T2). The evaluation included autism classification based on Autism Diagnosis Observation Schedule (ADOS) original algorithm, cognitive abilities (Mullen) and adaptive skills evaluation (Vineland). At T2, two groups were identified: the Unchanged group in = 53) remained in the same autism classification and the Improved group (n = 15) changed classification to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (n = 13) or Off Spectrum (n = 2). The verbal domain scores at T1 was the only significant variable that distinguished the two groups. Specifically, the Improved group had better receptive language scores than the Unchanged group. The Improved group gained significantly more than the Unchanged group in all the Outcome measures (cognitive, adaptive and reduction of stereotyped behaviors). Two distinct subtypes of autism were identified, one with stable autism symptomatology, poor verbal abilities and limited cognitive and adaptive gains, and a second type with better baseline verbal abilities and overall better response to intervention. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available