3.8 Article

Ten reasons to oppose the criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS
Volume 17, Issue 34, Pages 163-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)34462-6

Keywords

HIV/AIDS; criminal law; human rights; law and policy; women's health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent Years have seen G Push to apply criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission, often driven by the wish to respond to concerns about the ongoing rapid spread of HIV in many countries. Particularly in Africa, some groups have begun to advocate for criminalization in response to the serious phenomenon of women being infected with HIV through sexual violence or by partners who do not reveal their HIV diagnoses to them. While these issues must be urgently addressed, a closer analysis of the complex issues raised by criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission reveals that criminalization is unlikely to prevent new infections or reduce women's vulnerability to HIV In fact, it may harm women rather than assist them, and hove a negative impact on public health and human rights. This paper is a slightly revised version Of G document originally released in December 2008 by a coalition of HIV, women's and human rights organizations. It provides ten reasons why criminalizing HIV exposure or transmission is generally an unjust and ineffective public policy The obvious exception involves cases where individuals purposely or maliciously transmit HIV with the intent to harm others. In these rare cases, existing criminal laws - rather than new, HIV-specific lows - con and should be used. (C) 2009 Open Society Institute. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available