4.3 Article

The stability of psychopathy across adolescence

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1133-1153

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579409990083

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [G0601483] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0601483] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0601483] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH49414, MH60104, R01 MH060104, MH45070, R01 MH045070, R01 MH049414, R01 MH060104-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current diagnostic system suggests that personality disorder categories be applied to children and adolescents in rare circumstances because of expected changes in personality pathology across development. The present study examined the stability in personality pathology. specifically psychopathy, across childhood and adolescence. Using a short form of the CPS and mixed models incorporating fixed and random effects, we examined the reliability, individual stability, mean-level stability, and predictive utility of juvenile psychopathy as a function of age (i.e., from 7 to 17 years old) in over 1,500 boys from the three cohorts of the Pittsburgh Youth Study. If adolescent development contributes to instability in personality pathology, large age-related fluctuations in reliability, stability, and predictive utility should be observed, particularly in the latter part of adolescence when normative changes are hypothesized to influence levels of psychopathy. Such fluctuations were not observed. In general, juvenile psychopathy could be reliably assessed beginning in childhood, was fairly stable across short and long intervals, showed little mean-level fluctuation, and predicted delinquency across adolescence. These results suggest that concerns about large changes in personality pathology across childhood and adolescence may be overstated. Implications and future directions am discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available