4.6 Article

Assessment of explicit and semi-explicit classes of model-based algorithms for direct integration in structural dynamics

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5153

Keywords

direct integration algorithm; explicit; unconditional stability; numerical damping; dynamic analysis

Funding

  1. P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science (RCEAS)
  2. Yen fellowship through the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The model-based' algorithms available in the literature are primarily developed for the direct integration of the equations of motion for hybrid simulation in earthquake engineering, an experimental method where the system response is simulated by dividing it into a physical and an analytical domain. The term model-based' indicates that the algorithmic parameters are functions of the complete model of the system to enable unconditional stability to be achieved within the framework of an explicit formulation. These two features make the model-based algorithms also potential candidates for computations in structural dynamics. Based on the algorithmic difference equations, these algorithms can be classified as either explicit or semi-explicit, where the former refers to the algorithms with explicit difference equations for both displacement and velocity, while the latter for displacement only. The algorithms pertaining to each class are reviewed, and a new family of second-order unconditionally stable parametrically dissipative semi-explicit algorithms is presented. Numerical characteristics of these two classes of algorithms are assessed under linear and nonlinear structural behavior. Representative numerical examples are presented to complement the analytical findings. The analysis and numerical examples demonstrate the advantages and limitations of these two classes of model-based algorithms for applications in structural dynamics. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available