4.4 Article

Topical Verapamil as a Scar Modulator

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 968-975

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-014-0400-9

Keywords

Verapamil; Keloids; Calcium channel antagonist; Fibroblasts; Collagen

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian Health Council [196/1996]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skin injuries and the consequent loss of tissue integrity triggers a sequence of cellular and biochemical events that lead to a healed wound. Any failure during this rather sophisticated process may result in pathological scarring. To evaluate the efficacy of topical verapamil as a modulator of the healing process, a group of five observers (plastic surgeon, dermatologist, physiotherapist, biologist, and layman) analyzed pictures of 120 patients 3 months after abdominoplasty (60 patients) and mammoplasty (60 patients). Half of each group of patients used the topical verapamil scar modulator. Pictures were rated using the Stony Brook Scale. According to the classification established by us, the scars in patients who used topical verapamil scar modulator showed better results than those who did not (p < 0.05). Patients treated with verapamil presented good-quality scarring (80 % of mammoplasty scars and 75.2 % abdominoplasty scars), while patients who did not use healing modulators showed 48 and 51.2 % satisfaction for mammoplasty and abdominoplasty scars, respectively. No adverse reactions were observed or reported after the use of topical verapamil. This is the first clinical trial that reports the use of topical verapamil as a modulator in the healing process in the postoperative period. Based on clinical results and on the high level of reliability and statistical significance, we concluded that verapamil at a concentration of 50 A mu M is an excellent choice as a scar modulator; its use avoids the development of keloids and hypertrophic scars after plastic surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available