Journal
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 517-534Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0017351
Keywords
probability; conjunction error; disjunction error; weighted average; representative
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article explores the configural weighted average (CWA) hypothesis suggesting that extension biases, like conjunction and disjunction errors, occur because people estimate compound probabilities by taking a CWA of the constituent probabilities. The hypothesis suggests a process consistent with well-known cognitive constraints, which nonetheless achieves high robustness and bounded rationality in noisy real-life environments. Predictions by the CWA hypothesis are that in error-free data, conjunction and disjunction errors should be the rule rather than the exception when pairs of statements are randomly sampled from an environment, the rate of extension errors should increase when noise in data is decreased, and that adding a likely component should increase the probability of a conjunction. Four experiments generally verify the predictions by the hypothesis, demonstrating that extension errors are frequent also when tasks are selected according to representative design.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available