4.7 Article

Parameter-independent model reduction of transient groundwater flow models: Application to inverse problems

Journal

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 168-180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.009

Keywords

Model reduction; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Inverse problem; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Greedy algorithm; Snapshot selection

Funding

  1. NSF [EAR-0910507, EAR-1314422]
  2. ARO [W911NF-10-1-0124]
  3. AECOM endowment
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1314422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1314422] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new methodology is proposed for the development of parameter-independent reduced models for transient groundwater flow models. The model reduction technique is based on Galerkin projection of a highly discretized model onto a subspace spanned by a small number of optimally chosen basis functions. We propose two greedy algorithms that iteratively select optimal parameter sets and snapshot times between the parameter space and the time domain in order to generate snapshots. The snapshots are used to build the Galerkin projection matrix, which covers the entire parameter space in the full model. We then apply the reduced subspace model to solve two inverse problems: a deterministic inverse problem and a Bayesian inverse problem with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. The proposed methodology is validated with a conceptual one-dimensional groundwater flow model. We then apply the methodology to a basin-scale, conceptual aquifer in the Oristano plain of Sardinia, Italy. Using the methodology, the full model governed by 29,197 ordinary differential equations is reduced by two to three orders of magnitude, resulting in a drastic reduction in computational requirements. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available