4.7 Article

Agricultural effluent control under uncertainty: An inexact double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained model

Journal

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 997-1014

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.002

Keywords

Fuzzy chance-constrained programming; Interval linear programming; Effluent control management; Agricultural system; Uncertainty

Funding

  1. Nanyang Technological University (NTU) [SUG-M58030000]
  2. DHI-NTU Water and Environment Research Centre and Education Hub

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An inexact double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained programming (IDFCCP) method was developed in this study and applied to an agricultural effluent control management problem. IDFCCP was formulated through incorporating interval linear programming (ILP) into a double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained programming (DFCCP) framework, and could be used to deal with uncertainties expressed as not only possibility distributions associated with both left- and right-hand-side components of constraints but also discrete intervals in the objective function. The study results indicated that IDFCCP allowed violation of system constraints at specified confidence levels, where each confidence level consisted of two reliability scenarios. This could lead to model solutions with high system benefits under acceptable risk magnitudes. Furthermore, the introduction of ILP allowed uncertain information presented as discrete intervals to be communicated into the optimization process, such that a variety of decision alternatives can be generated by adjusting the decision-variable values within their intervals. The proposed model could help decision makers establish various production patterns with cost-effective water quality management schemes under complex uncertainties, and gain in-depth insights into the trade-offs between system economy and reliability. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available