4.7 Article

Effect of channel size on solute residence time distributions in rivers

Journal

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 1118-1127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.016

Keywords

Channel size; Hyporheic exchange; Longitudinal dispersion; Residence time distribution; VART model

Funding

  1. USGS
  2. Louisiana Water Resources Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of channel size on residence time distributions (RTDs) of solute in rivers is investigated in this paper using tracer test data and the variable residence time (VART) model. Specifically, the investigation focuses on the influence of shear dispersion and hyporheic exchange on the shape of solute RID, and how these two transport processes prevail in larger and smaller streams, respectively, leading to distinct tails of RID. Simulation results show that (1) RTDs are dispersion-dependent and thereby channel-size (scale) dependent. RTDs increasing longitudinal dispersion coefficient. Small streams with negligible dispersion coefficient may display various types of RID from upward curving patterns to a straight line (power-law distributions) and further to downward curving lognormal distributions when plotted in log-log coordinates. Moderate-sized rivers are transitional in terms of RTDs and commonly exhibit lognormal and power-law RTDs; (2) the incorporation of water and solute losses/gains in the VART model can improve simulation results and make parameter values more reasonable; (3) the ratio of time to peak concentration to the minimum mean residence time is equal to the recovery ratio of tracer. The relation provides a simple method for determining the minimum mean residence time; and (4) the VART model is able to reproduce various RTDs observed in rivers with 3-4 fitting parameters while no user-specified RID functions are needed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available