4.7 Article

A parallel evolutionary strategy based simulation-optimization approach for solving groundwater source identification problems

Journal

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1373-1385

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.06.001

Keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; Inverse problems; Parallel simulation-optimization framework; Groundwater source identification problem; High performance computing

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [BES-0238623, BES-0312841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Groundwater characterization involves the resolution of unknown system characteristics from observation data, and is often classified as an inverse problem. Inverse problems are difficult to solve due to natural ill-posedness and computational intractability. Here we adopt the use of a simulation-optimization approach that couples a numerical pollutant-transport simulation model with evolutionary search algorithms for solution of the inverse problem. In this approach, the numerical transport model is solved iteratively during the evolutionary search. This process can be computationally intensive since several hundreds to thousands of forward model evaluations are typically required for solution. Given the potential computational intractability of such a simulation-optimization approach, parallel computation is employed to ease and enable the solution of such problems. In this paper, several variations of a ground-water source identification problem is examined in terms of solution quality and computational performance. The computational experiments were performed on the TeraGrid cluster available at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications. The results demonstrate the performance of the parallel simulation-optimization approach in terms of solution quality and computational performance. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available