4.6 Article

Eliminating negative VTEC in global ionosphere maps using inequality-constrained least squares

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 988-1000

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.026

Keywords

Global ionosphere maps; Inequality constraint least square; GPS; IGS; Differential code bias

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40804005]
  2. 863 Project [2011AA120503, 2012AA12A202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations of the International GNSS Service (IGS) are distributed unevenly around the world. Most of them are located on the mainland, while only a small part of them are scattered on some islands in the oceans. As a consequence, many unreasonable zero values (in fact negative values) appear in Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) of European Space Agency (ESA) and Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) IONEX products, especially in 2008 and 2009 when the solar activities were rather quiet. To improve this situation, we directly implement non-negative physical constraints of ionosphere for global ionosphere maps (GIM) with spherical harmonic functions. Mathematically, we propose an inequality-constrained least squares method by imposing non-negative inequality constraints in the areas where negative VTEC values may occur to reconstruct GIM models. We then apply the new method to process the IGS data in 2008. The results have shown that the new algorithm efficiently eliminates the unwanted behavior of negative VTEC values, which could otherwise often be seen in the current CODE and ESA GIM products in both middle and high latitude areas of the Southern Hemisphere (45 degrees S similar to 90 degrees S) and the Northern Hemisphere (50 degrees N similar to 90 degrees N). About 64% of GPS receivers' DCBs have been significantly improved. Finally, we compare the GIM results between with and without the inequality constraints, which has clearly shown that the GIM result with inequality constraints is significantly better than that without the inequality constraints. The inequality-constrained GIM result is also highly consistent with the final IGS products in terms of root mean squared (RMS) and mean VTEC. (C) 2012 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available