4.6 Article

Estimation of Galactic Cosmic Ray exposure inside and outside the Earth's magnetosphere during the recent solar minimum. between solar cycles 23 and 24

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 979-987

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2013.05.007

Keywords

Radiation exposure in Low Earth Orbit and near-Earth interplanetary space; Variation of dose rates with shielding over time; Galactic Cosmic Rays; Solar minimum; Monte-Carlo simulations

Funding

  1. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  2. German Aerospace Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evidently low solar activity observed between solar cycles 23 and 24 during the years 2008-2010 led to a substantial increase in the Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) intensity in comparison with preceding solar minima. As the GCRs consist of highly-ionizing charged particles having the potential to cause biological damage, they are a subject of concern for manned missions to space. With the enhanced particle fluxes observed between 2008 and 2010, it is reasonable to assume that the radiation exposure from GCR must have also increased to unusually high levels. In this paper, the GCR exposure outside and inside the Earth's magnetosphere is numerically calculated for time periods starting from 1970 to the end of 2011 in order to investigate the increase in dose levels during the years 2008-2010 in comparison with the last three solar minima. The dose rates were calculated in a water sphere, used as a surrogate for the human body, either unshielded or surrounded by aluminium shielding of 0.3, 10 or 40 g/cm(2). By performing such a long-term analysis, it was estimated that the GCR exposure during the recent solar minimum was indeed the largest in comparison with previous minima and that the increase was more pronounced for locations outside the magnetosphere. (C) 2013 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available