4.6 Article

Hierarchical object oriented classification using very high resolution imagery and LIDAR data over urban areas

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 1101-1110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.11.008

Keywords

Object oriented classifications; LIDAR data; SSI; Normalized Digital Surface Model

Funding

  1. National Key Developing Program for Basic Science of China [2006CB701302, 2007CB714403]
  2. MACRES Airborne Remote Sensing (MARS) Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban land cover information extraction is a hot topic within urban studies. Heterogeneous spectra of high resolution imagery-caused by the inner complexity of urban areas-make it difficult. In this paper a hierarchical object oriented classification method over an urban area is presented. Combining QuickBird imagery and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) data, nine kinds of land cover objects were extracted. The Spectral Shape Index (SSI) method is used to distinguish water and shadow from black body mask, with 100% classification accuracy for water and 95.56%, for shadow. Vegetation was extracted by using a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) image at first, and then a more accurate classification result of shrub and grassland is obtained by integrating the height information from LIDAR data. The classification accuracy of shrub was improved from 85.25% to 92.09% and from 82.86% to 97.06%, for grassland. More granularity of this classification can be obtained by using this method. High buildings and low buildings can, for example, be distinguished from the original building class. Road class can also be further classified into roads and crossroads. The comparison of the classification accuracy between this method and the traditional pixel-based method indicates that the total accuracy is improved from 69.12% to 89.40%. (C) 2008 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available