4.0 Article

The Rhetorical Presidency Today: How Does It Stand Up?

Journal

PRESIDENTIAL STUDIES QUARTERLY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 908-931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03714.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Jeffrey Tulis based his book The Rhetorical Presidency on the empirical assertion that pre-twentieth-century presidents avoided communicating with the public on policy matters and instead directed their policy-oriented communications to Congress, in writing. Subsequent scholarship, however, has demonstrated that many of these presidents actually did communicate extensively with the American people on policy matters, rather than going through Congress. Some gave speeches or wrote public letters, while others utilized the facade of a presidential newspaper that featured commentaries widely understood to reflect the president's views. Presidential communications behavior during this era was much more variable, and far less influenced by one constitutional norm, than Tulis portrays in The Rhetorical Presidency. The variability is due to presidents attempting to accommodate conflicting views of their appropriate role in the constitutional order.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available