4.2 Article

Diversity of Babesia in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Poland

Journal

ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 364-369

Publisher

ELSEVIER URBAN & PARTNER SP Z O O
DOI: 10.2478/v10039-012-0023-9

Keywords

Babesia; Ixodes ricinus; ticks; babesiosis; Poland; diversity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N404 795240]
  2. Iuventus Plus [IP2010 045470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aims of this study were: (1) to estimate Babesia prevalence in the most common species of tick in Poland, Ixodes ricinus, in two recreational areas (Urwitalt in the Mazury Lake District and Bielanski Forest in Warsaw), and (2) to evaluate the molecular diversity of Babesia isolates in questing I. ricinus in Poland. Material and Methods: Questing ticks were collected from vegetation in forest areas in Urwitalt near Mikolajki and in Bielanski Forest (Warsaw). Purified genomic DNA was used with specific primers to amplify a fragment of the Babesia spp. 18S rRNA gene. Results: Tick-drag indices for I. ricinus were high in both study areas, reaching somewhat higher values in Urwitalt than in Bielanski Forest. The overall prevalence of Babesia spp. in examined ticks was 1.6%. In Urwitalt, two strains of B. microti were identified using rRNA sequences: the enzootic Munich strain and an isolate close to the zoonotic Jena strain. The proportion of infections due to these two strains in questing ticks reversed over a six-year period. During 3 years of study in Bielanski Forest, all Babesia isolates obtained from I. ricinus were identical to Babesia sp. EU1 (B. venatorum), previously recognized as an agent of human babesiosis. Conclusions: This study has confirmed the presence of enzoonotic and zoonotic Babesia species/strains in the abundant human-biting tick I. ricinus in recreational areas in Poland. It has also shown that the distribution of different genotypes has changed over time, however the reasons for these fluctuations still remain to be investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available