4.2 Article

Predictive models for subtypes of autism spectrum disorder based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms and magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 334-342

Publisher

MEDICAL UNIV BIALYSTOK
DOI: 10.2478/v10039-011-0042-y

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Asperger syndrome; high-functioning autism; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; brain morphometry; diagnostic model

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [2008101370]
  2. National Natural Science foundation of China [30570655]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1011]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 AG13743, R03 EB009310]
  5. National Institute of Aging
  6. National Institute of Mental Health
  7. National Cancer Institute
  8. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China [BK2008082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder, of which Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism are subtypes. Our goal is: 1) to determine whether a diagnostic model based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), brain regional thickness measurements, or brain regional volume measurements can distinguish Asperger syndrome from high-functioning autism; and 2) to compare the SNP, thickness, and volume-based diagnostic models. Material and Methods: Our study included 18 children with ASD: 13 subjects with high-functioning autism and 5 subjects with Asperger syndrome. For each child, we obtained 25 SNPs for 8 ASD-related genes; we also computed regional cortical thicknesses and volumes for 66 brain structures, based on structural magnetic resonance (MR) examination. To generate diagnostic models, we employed five machine-learning techniques: decision stump, alternating decision trees, multi-class alternating decision trees, logistic model trees, and support vector machines. Results: For SNP-based classification, three decision-tree-based models performed better than the other two machine-learning models. The performance metrics for three decision-tree-based models were similar: decision stump was modestly better than the other two methods, with accuracy = 90%, sensitivity = 0.95 and specificity = 0.75. All thickness and volume-based diagnostic models performed poorly. The SNP-based diagnostic models were superior to those based on thickness and volume. For SNP-based classification, rs878960 in GABRB3 (gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor, beta 3) was selected by all tree-based models. Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrated that SNP-based classification was more accurate than morphometry-based classification in ASD subtype classification. Also, we found that one SNP-rs878960 in GABRB3-distinguishes Asperger syndrome from high-functioning autism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available