4.1 Article

COHESION, CONSENSUS AND EXTREME INFORMATION IN OPINION DYNAMICS

Journal

ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219525913500355

Keywords

Opinion dynamics; numerical simulation; cohesion; extreme external information/media; consensus

Funding

  1. EveryAware project
  2. Future and Emerging Technologies program (IST-FET) of the European Commission under the EU RD [IST-265432]
  3. EuroUnderstanding Collaborative Research Projects DRUST
  4. European Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Opinion formation is an important element of social dynamics. It has been widely studied in the last years with tools from physics, mathematics and computer science. Here, a continuous model of opinion dynamics for multiple possible choices is analyzed. Its main features are the inclusion of disagreement and possibility of modulating external information/media effects, both from one and multiple sources. The interest is in identifying the effect of the initial cohesion of the population, the interplay between cohesion and media extremism, and the effect of using multiple external sources of information that can influence the system. Final consensus, especially with the external message, depends highly on these factors, as numerical simulations show. When no external input is present, consensus or segregation is determined by the initial cohesion of the population. Interestingly, when only one external source of information is present, consensus can be obtained, in general, only when this is extremely neutral, i.e., there is not a single opinion strongly promoted, or in the special case of a large initial cohesion and low exposure to the external message. On the contrary, when multiple external sources are allowed, consensus can emerge with one of them even when this is not extremely neutral, i.e., it carries a strong message, for a large range of initial conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available