4.6 Article

Amycolatopsis sp Poz14 isolated from oil-contaminated soil degrades polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Journal

INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 165-173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.01.008

Keywords

LMW-PAHs; HMW-PAHs; Amycolatopsis sp Poz14; Oil-contaminated soil

Funding

  1. Institut Politecnico Nacional (IPN) [SIP20140329, SIP20150314]
  2. CONACyT
  3. Programa Institucional de Formacion de Investigadores (PIFI)
  4. IPN
  5. COFAA
  6. EDI, IPN
  7. SNI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main actinobacterial genera able to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) include Mycobacterium, Nocardia, Rhodococcus, and Gordonia. However, it is unknown if other actinobacterial genera can degrade PAHs. In this work, three actinobacteria strains that utilize PAHs as the sole source of carbon and energy, were isolate and termed Amycolatopsis sp. Poz14, Gordonia sp. Poz20, and Rhodacoccus sp. Poz54. The strains use low-molecular-weight (LMW; naphthalene and anthracene) and high-molecular-weight (HMW; pyrene and fluoranthene) PAHs at 50 mg L-1 as the sole carbon and energy sources; except Amycolatopsis sp. Poz14 which tolerate up to 200 mg L-1. Amycolatopsis sp. Poz14 exhibited higher degradation percentages for LMW-PAH than HMW-PAH, from 100% for naphthalene, 37.87% for anthracene, 25.10% for pyrene, and 18.18% for fluoranthene within 45-day. Degradation efficiency of PAHs by Amycolatopsis sp. Poz14 improved by adding tween 20 to 1000 mg L-1. Moreover, degradation kinetics of binary mixtures of PAHs were conducted, Amycolatopsis sp. Poz14 used both PAHs from the beginning of the kinetics, and degradation efficiencies in binary mixtures were better than those achieved in single PAH. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report involving to genus Amycolatopsis in the degradation of LMW- and HMW-PAHs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available