4.6 Article

RNA Binding Protein with Multiple Splicing: A New Marker for Retinal Ganglion Cells

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 1052-1058

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4098

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness
  2. Oppenheimer Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To characterize expression of the RNA binding protein (RBPMS) in the retina as a specific marker for retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). METHODS. Optic nerve transection (ONT) was performed on adult male Wistar rats. Retrograde RGC labeling was performed with FluoroGold (FG) applied to the cut surface of the optic nerve. RBPMS mRNA and protein expression in the retina was analyzed by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The expression of RBPMS in various rat tissues was analyzed with semiquantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS. RBPMS mRNA and protein expression was localized primarily to irregularly shaped cells in the ganglion cell layer of the retina. Quantitative analysis showed that almost 100% of RGCs labeled by FG were also RBPMS-positive, irrespective of their location relative to the optic nerve head. Approximately 94% to 97% of RBPMS-positive cells were also positive for Thy-1, neurofilament H, and III beta-tubulin. In 2-week ONT retinas, the remaining few RGCs were weakly stained with RBPMS compared with intact RGCs in control retinas. Outside the retina, expression of RBPMS was observed in the heart, kidney, liver, and lungs. No expression was detected in any neuronal tissues except the retina. CONCLUSIONS. The data indicate that in the retina RBPMS is selectively expressed in RGCs and therefore could serve as a marker for RGC quantification in normal retinas and for estimation of RGC loss in ocular neuropathies. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1052-1058) DOI:10.1167/iovs.09-4098

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available