3.9 Article

High-Throughput Screening for Kv1.3 Channel Blockers Using an Improved FLIPR-Based Membrane-Potential Assay

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 185-195

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087057109356209

Keywords

high-throughput screening; Kv1.3 channel; FLIPR membrane potential assay; sodium azide; IonWorks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Voltage-gated K(+) channels are potential drug targets for an increasing number of disease indications. Searching for compounds that modulate K(+) channel activities by high-throughput screening (HTS) is becoming a standard approach in the drug discovery effort. Here the authors report an improved fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) membrane potential assay for Kv1.3 K(+) channel HTS. They have found that the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have endogenous membrane electrogenic transporters that contribute to maintaining membrane potential. Blocking the recombinant K(+) channels in the overexpressing CHO cell line hardly changed the membrane potential. Inhibition of the endogenous transporters is essential to achieve the required assay robustness. The authors identified the optimal assay conditions and designed a simple assay format. After an HTS campaign using this assay, various chemical series of Kv1.3 channel blockers have been identified and confirmed by the automated electrophysiological IonWorks assay. The correlation in dose response between FLIPR and IonWorks was established by biophysical modeling and experimental data. After characterization using patch-clamp recording, both use-dependent and use-independent compounds were identified. Some compounds possess nanomolar potency, indicating that the FLIPR assay is effective for successfully identifying K(+) channel blockers as novel drug candidates. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2010:185-195)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available