4.7 Article

Magnetic field effects on force convection flow of a nanofluid in a channel partially filled with porous media using Lattice Boltzmann Method

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 666-675

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2013.10.012

Keywords

Magnetic field; Nanofluid; Porous medium; Conjugated heat transfer; Lattice Boltzmann Method; Temperature sensitive properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper the Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) is utilized to investigate the effects of uniform vertical magnetic field on the flow pattern and fluid-solid coupling heat transfer in a channel which is partially filled with porous medium. Al2O3-water nanofluid as a work fluid with temperature sensitive properties is forced to flow into the channel while the top and bottom walls of the channel is heated and kept at a constant temperature. In the present study, with respect to previous works and experimental data, a new correlation is presented for density of Al2O3-water nanofluid as a function of temperature. The result also shows that the step approximation which is used for the complex boundaries of porous medium is reliable. Finally, the effect of various volume fractions of nanoparticles (phi = 0%, 3%, 5% and 7%) and different magnitude of magnetic field (Ha = 0, 5, 10 and 15) on the rate of heat transfer are thoroughly explored. In accordance with the results, by raising the nanoparticle volume fraction, average temperature and velocity at the outlet of the channel increase and the average Nusselt number rises dramatically. In addition, the increase the Hartmann number leads to the slow growth in the average Nusselt number, although the outlet average temperature and velocity shows a little drop. (C) 2013 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available