4.7 Article

Influence of air bubble size on float-sink of spheres in a gas-solid fluidized bed

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 120-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2011.08.002

Keywords

Fluidized bed; Dry separation; Bed height; Air bubble size

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The float-sink of density adjusted spheres of different diameter (10-40 mm) in a gas-solid fluidized bed was investigated at various bed heights (50-200 mm). The maximum density of floating spheres (rho(float)) and the minimum density of sinking spheres (rho(sink)) were determined by the float-sink experiments. The fluidized bed density (rho(fb)) was measured using the height and cross section of the fluidized bed and total weight of the fluidized media. The diameter of air bubbles at the bed surface was measured at each bed height, and was normalized by the sphere diameter. It was found that the value of rho(fb)-rho(float) approaches zero as the normalized bubble diameter decreases from 4 to 0.5 regardless of the sphere diameter. The value of rho(sink)-rho(fb) for sphere diameter = 10 mm approaches zero as the normalized bubble diameter decreases from 4 to 1.5, whereas the value for sphere diameter = 20-40 mm rises from zero as the normalized bubble diameter decreases from 1.5 to 0.5. The float and sink of spheres basically tend to follow the fluidized bed density with decreasing the normalized bubble diameter. However, relatively larger spheres do not sink based on the density difference as the normalized bubble diameter decreases, which may be due to that the fluidized bed viscosity becomes larger as the normalized bed diameter decreases. (C) 2011 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available